Which of the following best describes a rebuttable presumption?

A rebuttable presumption is a legal concept that establishes an assumption that can be challenged and overturned if presented with sufficient evidence. This means that while the presumption holds weight in legal proceedings, it is not definitive; the presumption can be negated or rebutted by presenting facts or testimonials that dispute it.

The key aspect of a rebuttable presumption is that it allows individuals the opportunity to provide evidence to prove their case against the presumption. For example, if a law states that a person is presumed to have acted negligently under certain circumstances, that person can present evidence to show that they acted carefully and did not demonstrate negligence.

This characteristic of being able to challenge the presumption is vital to ensuring fairness in legal proceedings, allowing for a balanced consideration of all evidence before arriving at a concluding judgment. Other options describe aspects that do not align with the concept of a rebuttable presumption, such as notions of permanence, lack of defense, or assumptions based solely on common belief.